Rick Green in this week's Boston Business Journal

As you may remember, Proposition 80 (Prop 80) is a measure that would levy an 80% tax increase on the state’s top earners. The measure, expected to be a 2018 ballot initiative, received some coverage this week. The Boston Business Journal highlighted that many Massachusetts employers fear that the tax will decrease their ability to hire new people and will drive down economic output.
The article also features our Board Chairman, Rick Green, and his thoughts on Prop 80. You may read the article by clicking here.


Photo: Boston Business Journal: W. Marc Bernseau

DeLeo’s Budget Revealed, Kind of…

Today, House Speaker Robert DeLeo and his lieutenants released the $40B FY18 budget, the first major piece of legislation since the massive pay raises in January. 
Almost 100 days have passed since the House debated the rules and pushed through those pay raises. In that time, the chamber has been remarkably silent. And yet, amendments to the $40B budget are due from lawmakers in just three days. 
The narrow window is a key to the Speaker's autocratic control of the House.  It's not enough time for legislators or the public to really dig in to the budget. In the Speaker's my-way-or-the-highway style, the less information the public has, the better.
Debate will likely begin April 24. Until then, the MassFiscal team will be analyzing the House budget's implications for taxpayers. We'll keep you posted as the process moves along.
One thing is for sure. Liberals and conservatives should unite behind the demand for more openness in the budget process. DeLeo's tactics of keeping both rank and file and the public in the dark are bad governing. 
More to come…

It's Time to Close The Union Loophole

1A Auto v. Sullivan (Political Contribution Ban) Update 

The lawsuit filed to close the Union Loophole (a state campaign finance law that gives unions the ability to fund political campaigns with five-figure donations while barring businesses from contributing at all) is headed to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

The law under scrutiny lets unions directly give up to $15,000 to candidate campaigns, while limiting individuals to $1,000 and barring businesses from donating at all.  Yesterday, a Superior Court judge ruled that those disparities can continue

The suit was filed in 2015 by businesses owned by MassFiscal chairman Rick Green and board member Mike Kane. The lawsuit, 1A Auto v. Sullivan, sought equal protection for all. The judge’s opinion, which is now being appealed, held that treating unions and corporations differently "serves the anti-corruption interest."

The plaintiff’s attorney, Jim Manley of the Goldwater Institute, called the ruling "unfair from any perspective," and said the next step is to take the fight to the Supreme Judicial Court. 

To read news reports on this update, follow the links below. 
Boston Business Journal
New Boston Post



The laws of six states prohibit businesses—but not unions or other groups—from contributing to political parties, committees, or candidates. This uneven playing field violates state and federal constitutional guarantees of equal protection, free speech, and free association.

On February 24th, two Massachusetts companies, in coordination with the nationally recognized Goldwater Institute, filed a bold lawsuit seeking to close the “union loophole” in Massachusetts campaign finance law, and both plaintiffs in the lawsuit have connections to the Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance. 1A Auto Inc., a family-owned auto parts retailer in Pepperell, is run by Rick Green, who is also the chairman of Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance's board of directors. Mike Kane, whose Ashland business, 126 Self Storage Inc., is also part of the suit, serves on Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance's board as well.

Massachusetts’ campaign contribution restrictions are tilted heavily in favor of unions and against businesses. Since 1908, businesses have faced a total contribution ban to state candidates. The “union loophole” originated by special rules implemented outside the normal legislative process in 1988. These special rules allow unions to contribute as much as $15,000 to state candidates, while individuals are permitted to contribute up to $1,000. After unions have donated $15,000 to a campaign, their political actions committees (PACs) can continue to contribute up to the ordinary limits. Meanwhile, business PACs are banned from contributing.


The Goldwater Institute's summary of the case may be found here

Copy of Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (2/24/2014).

The Superior Court's Decision (4/6/17) can be found here. 


1A Auto, Inc., a family-owned auto parts retailer in Pepperell, Mass. It started selling auto parts in 1999 and employs 217 people.

126 Self Storage, Inc., a small self-storage facility in Ashland, Mass. In business since 1999, it employs four people.


Michael Sullivan, Director, Office of Campaign and Political Finance


Massachusetts Judicial Supreme Court



Relief sought

The businesses are asking the Massachusetts courts to declare the uneven contribution ban unconstitutional and enjoin its enforcement.

Date originally filed

February 24, 2015

Read more


get updates